Thursday, March 29, 2007

Young Blogger Took on the Coverage of Chongqing Nail House


Other homeowners protesting on the site of the Chongqing nail house (left)
Looking at the construction site from a nearby light rail station (right)

While the Chinese public is hungry for the latest update about the Chongqing nail house after the mainland media were largely squelched in their coverage, thanks to a young and restless blogger, people are now satisfied with on-site reporting published online.

Being perhaps the first non-journalist blogger in China to do original field reporting, Zola Zhou, a 26-year-old Hunan native, boarded a train on Monday and arrived in Chongqing early Wednesday “like a crazy rock,” on his own expense.

“News sensitivity and the desire to become famous overnight” brought him to Chongqing, he writes in his blog entry. By asking around, he found his way to the construction site where the nail house was still standing.

On Wednesday afternoon, he met Wu Ping. “Seeing her with my own eyes, [I] do not think she looks like a tough spicy girl [Chongqing women are nick-named “spicy girl” for their well-known pungent style], but an intelligent and well-mannered intellectual,” Mr. Zhou wrote. “[She] talked appropriately, like an experienced spokeswoman.”

He only had a two-minute conversation with Ms. Wu, who told him that despite the widespread rumor about her special background, the only background she had was “the law.” She also told Zhou to “be careful of health and safety.”

“Her heart is calm and strong, and deserves my trust and support,” Mr. Zhou wrote in his blog, published sometimes via his cellphone right on the scene.

Interestingly enough, Mr. Zhou met other home owners from Shanghai, Guangzhong, Zhuhai, Chengdu and Xi’an, who gathered at Wu Ping’s property site to propagate their own story of losing homes to redevelopment projects, since this place has attracted many journalists, domestic and foreign.

These people brought over pictures of their demolished houses, documents proving their legitimate rights to the properties and signs denouncing the government or claiming their own rights. A man from Xi’an even gave a public speech at the construction site, opposing the use of “nail house” on those who defend their properties, Mr. Zhou reported. Local people also told him that several cameras were installed in the trees and on the walls surrounding the site.

But what he reported is not as extraordinary as the reporting journey itself.

His action has won almost universal support in China’s cyberspace. Hundreds of people left comments on his blog and other sites that republished his posts, among which the words “support,” “be safe” and “be careful” appear most frequently. His readers apparently are concerned that he may get into trouble with the authorities.

Mr. Zhou is hailed by many as a grassroot hero as well as a “citizen journalist,” or “independent journalist.” Some praised Zhou as making history among Chinese bloggers by doing such original reporting, and called his endeavor revolutionary.

People expressed their disappointment and distrust of official media, while placing on Mr. Zhou their hope of getting the true story of the incident. “Now only such an individual media like you is trust worthy,” a web user named Jorin writes.

Another poster says he heard rumors that the house has been demolished, only to find the information untrue after reading Zhou’s report.

“Keep digging deep, looks like [I] can only know the truth from you,” a poster named HP writes.

People not only give him emotional support, but material one, too. By Thursday, supporters have wired about 1700 yuan (more than $200) to Zhou's bank card and telephone card. “I am not alone,” Zhou writes.

Currently not employed, Mr. Zhou has been spending a lot of time maintaining several websites of his own. He had received some computer skill training but never went to college. He described himself as an optimistic guy, “willing to help those who are really in need,” and aiming at becoming a “righteous, strong and dare-to-dream man with money.”

This young man has also been influenced by the entertaining spirit of the media culture in Hunnan, and claims his website to “entertain the mass,” a task he has well fulfilled with the field reporting from Chongqing.
(photos courtesy to Zola Zhou)

Monday, March 26, 2007

Chinese People Worried about Negligence of Chinese Language


Mr. Cheng Helin at the lecture


In a recent lecture in Hangzhou, Mr. Cheng Helin, deputy chief and a host of Phoenix TV Chinese Channel, faced a college girl’s question about her career problem as a Chinese major.

She said that while learning Chinese is gaining popularity overseas, college students majoring in the language find it hard to land a job at home.

In reflecting the event, Mr. Cheng wrote in his blog that it is true that while Confucius Institute is growing everywhere around the world, Chinese education is “facing embarrassing situation” at home.

Mr. Cheng’s advice to change the situation is to combine Chinese study with some specific career training, such as editing. Meanwhile, as he suggested, universities should remove their Chinese departments altogether and instead make Chinese a required subject for all majors, and “the status of Chinese class should be superior to that of English [class].”

Mr. Cheng is but one of an increasing number of Chinese people who have noticed the trend that English learning is more valued in China than Chinese, mostly because English skill is better appreciated in the job market. In hundreds of online comments regarding Mr. Cheng’s proposals, the concern is manifest.

A poster who identifies himself as a Chinese major in college was sad that a group of teenagers laughed at him when he told them Chinese is important. “I don’t know what does this show or mean…The fate of Chinese merits worries,” the student writes.

“Countrymen should examine their own conscience: should English be more important than Chinese? Ridiculous! A national will be over if its language is over,” another post reads.

People are also eager to call for more attention and respect for China’s native language.

“Most of the Chinese cultural legacy is passed down through generations by Chinese characters. If nobody studies the ancestors, where would our ancient culture go?” one poster asks.

A poster named “child-forever-loving-Chinese” writes: “as Chinese, if one can not master his mother tongue, what is the use to be fluent even in many other languages?”

“Without Chinese, we will have no language to face the world,” still another says.

Although quite a few comments applaud Mr. Cheng’s idea of making Chinese study a requirement for all majors, many don’t like the proposal of eliminating Chinese department in universities. Some even went so far as to warn that doing so could lead to the fall of the entire nation.

For some people, the problem is not just about Chinese education, but also lies in the entire country’s economic pursuit. On that front, English opens the door for working with foreign business, where a lot of money could be made.

Majoring in Chinese is not bad, but something is wrong with the social environment, as one poster points out, “Today’s society is too eager for quick success and instant benefits.”

And there is perhaps hope, too. “We have good reasons to believe that when our country’s economy advances to a certain stage, the state policy will favor the spiritual [cultural] realm,” one comment says.

Mr. Cheng's blog entry
Online comments

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Some Online Coverage of the Nailhouse still Alive

After the official ban on news coverage of the holdout in Chongqing was issued on Saturday, news broken by a Chinese blog, the special section about the incident on sina.com.cn is no longer there.

However, a couple of websites covering the holdout is still accessible on people.com.cn, one of the major state-run gateway websites, which is supposed to follow official publicity guidelines.

Similar coverage is also available on some commercial websites like NetEasy and sohu.com, by the time this post is published.

Here are the links:

people.com.cn
http://finance.people.com.cn/GB/1045/5510689.html
http://unn.people.com.cn/GB/14748/5513146.html

other sites:
http://news.163.com/07/0324/14/3ABVC5LQ0001124J.html
http://news.sohu.com/20070324/n248944151.shtml

the ban on press coverage
http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2007/03/chinese_government_forbidden_media_reports_about_the_na.php

Friday, March 23, 2007

Family Killed Officials and Refused to be Relocated

Ms. Wu Ping held an impromptu press conference next to her disputed property (left)

The house in question: the only one left on the construction site (right)


The episode of a Chongqing couple’s prolonged struggle of refusing to have their house demolished is not over yet, while a family in Jiangsu allegedly killed two people for the same kind of dispute: home demolishing and relocation.

On Thursday, Ma Xueming, a Suzhou resident, allegedly attacked and killed Zhang Jinlong, a manager of a relocation company, along with a female local community administrator, and injured another man from the company. The three people came to Ma's home to talk about compensation plan for demolishing his property and relocating his family due to a development project.

Mr. Ma were said to threw lime powder at the visitors and then stabbed them, witnesses told a local newspaper.

Police took away Mr. Ma, his wife and a teenager son right after the incident. The family was the only one yet to be relocated in the village, because they had not reached a compensation agreement with the real estate developer.

People who knew the family said they were quiet and honest people, and that it was “inconceivable” that they would take such “extreme actions,” local newspaper reported.

Upon reading the story, many web users point out that people in Suzhou are usually good-tempered. Now that even such nice people also start to violently resist relocation for real estate development is a signal that such practice has aroused huge public resent.

Most people don’t agree with the killing, but many express sympathy for the Ma family as well as their own hatred of government officials and relocation company personnel who often force people to move.

Many call the incident a tragedy, some compare Ma’s action with communist revolutionaries’ rebellion over half a century ago, and still some see the incident as yet another indicator of people’s fury against the government, who, as put in one comment, “has become the accomplice of real estate developers for the red and green paper [money bills].”

“The volcano is about to explode,” one posted a comment as saying.

“If real estate developers and local governments still don’t rein in on the brink of the precipice, more similar incidents will continue to occur around the country…and constantly undermine harmonious society,” another one writes.

“This is a typical case of [the result] of power overshadowing law. Grass-root people have no power and can only fight with death,” still another says.

The Suzhou incident was by no means the first time people died in conflicts regarding relocation. Two years ago, for example, an old couple in Shanghai was burnt to death in the house they refused to move out to make way for a development project. Shanghai government later announced that the arsonists were people from a local relocation company.

Meanwhile, a lot of public attention is still on the story in Chongqing.

The deadline of Thursday, which was set by a local court for Yang Wu and his wife Wu Ping to allow demolishing their house, passed without much happening. Construction workers have set up fences around Yang’s standing-alone property to stop people other than him, his wife and journalists from coming close. The couple tried to move back to live in the house a few days ago. They haven't lived there for about two years.

According to Chinese law, the court will enforce its ruling under coercion if Mr. Yang failed to obey it, but the court has yet taken any action. Court officials told state media that the court needed some time to carry out the enforcement. Wu Ping also told a dozen of journalists from around China that she was willing to give up her house if an agreement could be reached.

Suzhou killing
http://paper.people.com.cn/jnsb/html/2007-03/23/content_12642385.htm

Online comments
http://www.tianya.cn/publicforum/Content/free/1/879734.shtml
http://comment4.news.sina.com.cn/comment/skin/default.html?channel=gn&newsid=1-1-12589815&style=0

Chongqing conflict
http://finance.people.com.cn/GB/1045/5510689.html
http://news.sina.com.cn/z/cqzndzh/index.shtml